Files
mpm-brand-voice-plugin/skills/guideline-generation/references/guideline-template.md
T

7.0 KiB

Brand Guidelines Output Template

The complete structure for generated brand voice guidelines. Fill each section based on discovered and analyzed sources. The following is a raw markdown template — copy and fill the sections below. Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders.

[Company Name] Brand Voice Guidelines

Generation Metadata

  • Created: [date]
  • Version: [N] (incremented from previous if updating)
  • Replaces: [previous version date, if applicable]
  • Sources: [list of documents and/or conversations analyzed]
  • Documents processed: [N]
  • Conversations analyzed: [N]
  • Discovery report used: [Yes/No]
  • Overall confidence: [High/Medium/Low]

Executive Summary

[2-3 paragraph overview of the brand voice. What makes this brand distinctive? What is the core personality? How should content feel to the reader?]


We Are / We Are Not

The foundational brand identity anchor. Voice is constant — it doesn't change by channel or audience.

We Are We Are Not
[Attribute 1] — [brief description] [Counter 1] — [what to avoid]
[Attribute 2] — [brief description] [Counter 2] — [what to avoid]
[Attribute 3] — [brief description] [Counter 3] — [what to avoid]
[Attribute 4] — [brief description] [Counter 4] — [what to avoid]
[Attribute 5] — [brief description] [Counter 5] — [what to avoid]

Voice Attributes Detail

For each "We Are" attribute:

[Attribute 1]: [Name]

  • What it means: [detailed description]
  • How it shows up: [specific behaviors in content]
  • What to avoid: [the "We Are Not" counterpart, expanded]
  • Evidence: [source quote or pattern, with citation]
  • Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]

[Repeat for each attribute]


Brand Personality

  • Archetype: [e.g., "The Expert Friend" — technically deep but never condescending]
  • If our brand were a person: [brief personality sketch]
  • Core values expressed in voice: [list]

Messaging Framework

Primary Value Proposition

[Core value statement — one sentence]

Variations observed:

  • "[Variation 1]" (Source: [doc])
  • "[Variation 2]" (Source: [doc])

Key Message Pillars

  1. [Pillar Name]

    • Core idea: [one sentence]
    • When to use: [contexts]
    • Example phrasing: "[quote]"
    • Frequency in conversations: [X]% (if transcript data available)
    • Effectiveness: [High/Medium/Low] (if outcome data available)
  2. [Pillar Name] [same format]

  3. [Pillar Name] [same format]

Competitive Positioning

  • vs. [Competitor A]: [how we differentiate]
  • vs. [Competitor B]: [how we differentiate]
  • vs. Status Quo: [why change is worth it]

Tone-by-Context Matrix

Voice is constant. Tone flexes by context. These three dimensions adjust:

Context Formality Energy Technical Depth Key Principle
Cold outreach Medium High Low Hook fast, earn attention
Discovery calls Medium Medium-High Medium Ask more than tell
Demo / presentation Medium-High High High Show, don't just describe
Enterprise proposal High Medium High ROI and precision
Follow-up email Medium Medium Low-Medium Add new value each touch
Social media Low-Medium High Low Brevity and personality
Customer success Medium Warm Medium Empathy and competence
Internal comms Low Medium Varies Authentic, less polished

Context-Specific Guidelines

Cold Outreach

  • Overall tone: [description]
  • Opening approach: [what works]
  • Do's: [list]
  • Don'ts: [list]
  • Example: "[sample opening line]"

Discovery Calls

[same structure]

Proposals & RFPs

[same structure]

Social Media

[same structure]


Terminology Guide

Must-Use Terms

Term Usage Instead Of Example
[term] [when/how to use] [what it replaces] "[in a sentence]"

Preferred Terms

Term Usage Example
[term] [guidance] "[in a sentence]"

Avoid These Terms

Term Reason Alternative
[term] [why to avoid] [what to use instead]

Never-Use Terms

Term Reason
[term] [why this is prohibited]

Language That Works

Ranked by effectiveness (from conversation analysis, if available):

Top Phrases

  1. "[Phrase]" — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]
  2. "[Phrase]" — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]

Questions That Engage

  1. "[Question]" — Leads to: [typical outcome]
  2. "[Question]" — Leads to: [typical outcome]

Objection Handling Patterns

  1. Objection: "[common objection]" Response pattern: "[how top performers respond]" Why it works: [analysis]

Language to Avoid

Anti-Patterns

  1. "[Phrase/pattern]" — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"
  2. "[Phrase/pattern]" — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"

Content Examples

Excellent Examples

[Full example with annotation explaining what makes it on-brand]

Examples to Avoid

[Full example with annotation explaining what's off-brand and how to fix it]


Confidence Scores

Section Confidence Basis Sources
Voice Attributes [H/M/L] [why] [N sources]
Messaging Framework [H/M/L] [why] [N sources]
Tone Matrix [H/M/L] [why] [N sources]
Terminology [H/M/L] [why] [N sources]
Language Patterns [H/M/L] [why] [N sources]

Open Questions for Team Discussion

High Priority (blocks guideline completion)

  1. [Question Title]
    • What was found: [description of ambiguity]
    • Agent recommendation: [suggested resolution]
    • Need from you: [specific decision]

Medium Priority (improves quality)

[same format]

Low Priority (nice to have)

[same format]


Data Gaps & Recommendations

[What's missing and specific actions to fill gaps]

  • [Gap 1]: [recommendation to fill it]
  • [Gap 2]: [recommendation to fill it]

Appendix: Sources

# Source Platform Type Date Key Sections Used Confidence
1 [title] [platform] [AUTHORITATIVE/OPERATIONAL/etc.] [date] [sections] [H/M/L]

Template Usage Notes

  • Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders
  • If transcript data is unavailable, omit the "Language That Works" and "Language to Avoid" sections
  • If only documents are available (no transcripts), note this in metadata
  • "We Are / We Are Not" table should have minimum 4 rows, ideally 5-7
  • Tone matrix should cover at minimum: cold outreach, proposals, social media
  • All examples must have source attribution
  • Every open question must include an agent recommendation